Testing of a one dimensional model for Field II calibration

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2008

View graph of relations

Field II is a program for simulating ultrasound transducer fields. It is capable of calculating the emitted and pulse-echoed fields for both pulsed and continuous wave transducers. To make it fully calibrated a model of the transducer’s electro-mechanical impulse response must be included. We examine an adapted one dimensional transducer model originally proposed by Willatzen [9] to calibrate Field II. This model is modified to calculate the required impulse responses needed by Field II for a calibrated field pressure and external circuit current calculation. The testing has been performed with Pz27 piezoceramic discs from Ferroperm Piezoceramics A/S, Kvistgaard, Denmark. The transmitted acoustic pressures from two sets of each five disc samples with 10.08 mm diameters were measured in an automatic water bath needle hydrophone setup together with the current flow through the driving circuit. Resonance frequencies at 2.1 MHz and 4 MHz were applied. Two types of circuits were considered, one circuit with a simple resistance load of 47.5 Ohm and one with an example of a LR tuning circuit typically found in commercial transducers. The measurements were averaged 128 times and afterwards compared to the calibrated Field II program for 1, 4, and 10 cycle excitations. Two parameter sets were applied for modeling, one real valued Pz27 parameter set, manufacturer supplied, and one complex valued parameter set found in literature, Alguer´o et al. [11]. The latter implicitly accounts for attenuation. Results show that the combination of the model and Field II can calculate the pressure within −15 % to 5 % RMS error for long excitation bursts and 7 % to 23 % for short excitation bursts. Furthermore it is shown that current simulations can be done within 1 % to maximum 33 % RMS error, where best current simulations are found for 4 MHz long burst simulations and worst case is found for 2.1 MHz short bursts. Finally it is shown that maximum pressure deviation for the real parameter set and the complex parameter simulation is 3 % for pressure and 5.3 % for current.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
Volume1-4
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2008
Pages1417-1420
ISBN (Print)978-1-4244-2428-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Event2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium - Beijing, China
Duration: 2 Nov 20085 Nov 2008
http://ewh.ieee.org/conf/ius_2008/

Conference

Conference2008 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
CountryChina
CityBeijing
Period02/11/200805/11/2008
Internet address
CitationsWeb of Science® Times Cited: 1
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 5520041