The classical version of Stokes' Theorem revisited

Publication: CommunicationJournal article – Annual report year: 2008

Standard

The classical version of Stokes' Theorem revisited. / Markvorsen, Steen.

In: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2008, p. 879-888.

Publication: CommunicationJournal article – Annual report year: 2008

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Markvorsen, Steen / The classical version of Stokes' Theorem revisited.

In: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2008, p. 879-888.

Publication: CommunicationJournal article – Annual report year: 2008

Bibtex

@article{2b9d76efb5ad4256b867844c990e8d3c,
title = "The classical version of Stokes' Theorem revisited",
keywords = "Gauss' divergence theorem, undergraduate mathematics, Stokes' theorem, curriculum",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Ltd.",
author = "Steen Markvorsen",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/00207390802091146",
volume = "39",
number = "7",
pages = "879--888",
journal = "International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology",
issn = "0020-739X",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The classical version of Stokes' Theorem revisited

A1 - Markvorsen,Steen

AU - Markvorsen,Steen

PB - Taylor & Francis Ltd.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Using only fairly simple and elementary considerations - essentially from first year undergraduate mathematics - we show how the classical Stokes' theorem for any given surface and vector field in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ follows from an application of Gauss' divergence theorem to a suitable modification of the vector field in a tubular shell around the given surface. The two stated classical theorems are (like the fundamental theorem of calculus) nothing but shadows of the general version of Stokes' theorem for differential forms on manifolds. The main points in the present paper, however, is firstly that this latter fact usually does not get within reach for students in first year calculus courses and secondly that calculus textbooks in general only just hint at the correspondence alluded to above. Our proof that Stokes' theorem follows from Gauss' divergence theorem goes via a well known and often used exercise, which simply relates the concepts of divergence and curl on the local differential level. The rest of the paper uses only integration in $1$, $2$, and $3$ variables together with a 'fattening' technique for surfaces and the inverse function theorem.

AB - Using only fairly simple and elementary considerations - essentially from first year undergraduate mathematics - we show how the classical Stokes' theorem for any given surface and vector field in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ follows from an application of Gauss' divergence theorem to a suitable modification of the vector field in a tubular shell around the given surface. The two stated classical theorems are (like the fundamental theorem of calculus) nothing but shadows of the general version of Stokes' theorem for differential forms on manifolds. The main points in the present paper, however, is firstly that this latter fact usually does not get within reach for students in first year calculus courses and secondly that calculus textbooks in general only just hint at the correspondence alluded to above. Our proof that Stokes' theorem follows from Gauss' divergence theorem goes via a well known and often used exercise, which simply relates the concepts of divergence and curl on the local differential level. The rest of the paper uses only integration in $1$, $2$, and $3$ variables together with a 'fattening' technique for surfaces and the inverse function theorem.

KW - Gauss' divergence theorem

KW - undergraduate mathematics

KW - Stokes' theorem

KW - curriculum

U2 - 10.1080/00207390802091146

DO - 10.1080/00207390802091146

JO - International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

JF - International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology

SN - 0020-739X

IS - 7

VL - 39

SP - 879

EP - 888

ER -