Pulse current enhanced electrodialytic soil remediation : Comparison of different pulse frequencies
Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2012
Standard
Pulse current enhanced electrodialytic soil remediation : Comparison of different pulse frequencies. / Sun, Tian R.; Ottosen, Lisbeth M.; Jensen, Pernille E.
In: Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 237-238, 2012, p. 299-306.Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2012
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulse current enhanced electrodialytic soil remediation
T2 - Comparison of different pulse frequencies
A1 - Sun,Tian R.
A1 - Ottosen,Lisbeth M.
A1 - Jensen,Pernille E.
AU - Sun,Tian R.
AU - Ottosen,Lisbeth M.
AU - Jensen,Pernille E.
PB - Elsevier BV
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Energy consumption is an important factor influencing the cost of electrodialytic soil remediation (EDR). It has been indicated that the pulse current (in low frequency range) could decrease the energy consumption during EDR. This work is focused on the comparison of energy saving effect at different pulse frequencies. Based on the restoration of equilibrium, the relaxation process of the soil-water system was investigated by chronopotentiometric analysis to find the optimal relaxation time for energy saving. Results showed that the pulse current decreased the energy consumption with different extent depending on the pulse frequency. The experiment with the frequency of 16 cycles per day showed the best restoration of equilibrium and lowest energy consumption. The energy consumption per removed heavy metals was lower in pulse current experiments than constant current and increased with the pulse frequency. It was found that the transportation of cations through the cation exchange membrane was the rate controlling step both in constant and pulse current experiments, thus responsible for the major energy consumption. Substitution of the cation exchange membrane with filter paper resulted in a dramatic decrease in energy consumption, but this change impeded the acidification process and thus the removal of heavy metals decreased significantly. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - Energy consumption is an important factor influencing the cost of electrodialytic soil remediation (EDR). It has been indicated that the pulse current (in low frequency range) could decrease the energy consumption during EDR. This work is focused on the comparison of energy saving effect at different pulse frequencies. Based on the restoration of equilibrium, the relaxation process of the soil-water system was investigated by chronopotentiometric analysis to find the optimal relaxation time for energy saving. Results showed that the pulse current decreased the energy consumption with different extent depending on the pulse frequency. The experiment with the frequency of 16 cycles per day showed the best restoration of equilibrium and lowest energy consumption. The energy consumption per removed heavy metals was lower in pulse current experiments than constant current and increased with the pulse frequency. It was found that the transportation of cations through the cation exchange membrane was the rate controlling step both in constant and pulse current experiments, thus responsible for the major energy consumption. Substitution of the cation exchange membrane with filter paper resulted in a dramatic decrease in energy consumption, but this change impeded the acidification process and thus the removal of heavy metals decreased significantly. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - Electrodialytic remediation
KW - Pulse current
KW - Energy saving
KW - Relaxation
KW - Heavy metals
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.043
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.08.043
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 237-238
SP - 299
EP - 306
ER -