Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article – Annual report year: 2012

Standard

Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product. / Schubert, Per; Lagergren, Fredrik; Aurela, Mika; Christensen, Torben; Grelle, Achim; Heliasz, Michal; Klemedtsson, Leif; Lindroth, Anders; Pilegaard, Kim; Vesala, Timo; Eklundh, Lars.

In: Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 126, 2012, p. 136-147.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article – Annual report year: 2012

Harvard

Schubert, P, Lagergren, F, Aurela, M, Christensen, T, Grelle, A, Heliasz, M, Klemedtsson, L, Lindroth, A, Pilegaard, K, Vesala, T & Eklundh, L 2012, 'Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product' Remote Sensing of Environment, vol 126, pp. 136-147., 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

APA

Schubert, P., Lagergren, F., Aurela, M., Christensen, T., Grelle, A., Heliasz, M., ... Eklundh, L. (2012). Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product. Remote Sensing of Environment, 126, 136-147. 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

CBE

Schubert P, Lagergren F, Aurela M, Christensen T, Grelle A, Heliasz M, Klemedtsson L, Lindroth A, Pilegaard K, Vesala T, Eklundh L. 2012. Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product. Remote Sensing of Environment. 126:136-147. Available from: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

MLA

Vancouver

Schubert P, Lagergren F, Aurela M, Christensen T, Grelle A, Heliasz M et al. Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2012;126:136-147. Available from: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

Author

Schubert, Per; Lagergren, Fredrik; Aurela, Mika; Christensen, Torben; Grelle, Achim; Heliasz, Michal; Klemedtsson, Leif; Lindroth, Anders; Pilegaard, Kim; Vesala, Timo; Eklundh, Lars / Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product.

In: Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 126, 2012, p. 136-147.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article – Annual report year: 2012

Bibtex

@article{ec1715657a2948708c436fc9da3f5bc0,
title = "Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product",
keywords = "Gross primary productivity (GPP), Land surface temperature (LST), Light use efficiency (ε), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2)",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
author = "Per Schubert and Fredrik Lagergren and Mika Aurela and Torben Christensen and Achim Grelle and Michal Heliasz and Leif Klemedtsson and Anders Lindroth and Kim Pilegaard and Timo Vesala and Lars Eklundh",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005",
volume = "126",
pages = "136--147",
journal = "Remote Sensing of Environment",
issn = "0034-4257",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling GPP in the Nordic forest landscape with MODIS time series data—Comparison with the MODIS GPP product

A1 - Schubert,Per

A1 - Lagergren,Fredrik

A1 - Aurela,Mika

A1 - Christensen,Torben

A1 - Grelle,Achim

A1 - Heliasz,Michal

A1 - Klemedtsson,Leif

A1 - Lindroth,Anders

A1 - Pilegaard,Kim

A1 - Vesala,Timo

A1 - Eklundh,Lars

AU - Schubert,Per

AU - Lagergren,Fredrik

AU - Aurela,Mika

AU - Christensen,Torben

AU - Grelle,Achim

AU - Heliasz,Michal

AU - Klemedtsson,Leif

AU - Lindroth,Anders

AU - Pilegaard,Kim

AU - Vesala,Timo

AU - Eklundh,Lars

PB - Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - <p>Satellite sensor-derived data are suitable for regional estimations of several important biophysical variables. Data with a finer spatial resolution should improve regional estimations of GPP (gross primary productivity), since they better capture the variation in a heterogeneous landscape. The main objective of this study was to investigate if MODIS 500m reflectance data can be used to drive empirical models for regional estimations of GPP in Nordic forests. The performance of the proposed models was compared with the MODIS 1km GPP product. Linear regression analyses were made on 8-day averages of eddy covariance GPP from three deciduous and ten coniferous sites in relation to MODIS 8-day composite data and 8-day averages of modeled incoming PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density). Time series of EVI2 (two-band enhanced vegetation index) were calculated from MODIS 500m reflectance data and smoothed by a curve fitting procedure. For most sites, GPP was fairly strongly to strongly related to the product of EVI2 and PPFD (Deciduous: R<sup>2</sup>=0.45–0.86, Coniferous: R<sup>2</sup>=0.49–0.90). Similar strengths were found between GPP and the product of EVI2 and MODIS 1km daytime LST (land surface temperature) (R2=0.55–0.81, 0.57–0.77) and between GPP and EVI2, PPFD and daytime LST in multiple linear regressions (R<sup>2</sup>=0.73–0.89, 0.65–0.93). One year of data was collected from all coniferous sites to derive a general empirical model for GPP versus (1) the product of EVI2 and PPFD (R<sup>2</sup>=0.70), (2) the product of EVI2 and daytime LST (R<sup>2</sup>=0.62) and (3) EVI2, PPFD and daytime LST (R<sup>2</sup>=0.72). These three models were then validated at six sites for the remaining years by linearly relating eddy covariance GPP to modeled GPP, which resulted in fairly strong to strong relationships for most sites (R<sup>2</sup>=0.49–0.91, RMSE=0.63–1.22gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>, R<sup>2</sup>=0.53–0.73, RMSE=0.90–1.43gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>, R<sup>2</sup>=0.56–0.87, RMSE=0.79–1.11gCm<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>). In comparison, similar validation strengths were found for the latest collection 5.1 of the MODIS 1km GPP product (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59–0.88, RMSE=0.80–1.16gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>). The main conclusion is that the suggested empirical models driven by MODIS 500m reflectance data can be used for regional estimations of Nordic forest GPP, while preserving a finer resolution than the MODIS 1km GPP product.</p>

AB - <p>Satellite sensor-derived data are suitable for regional estimations of several important biophysical variables. Data with a finer spatial resolution should improve regional estimations of GPP (gross primary productivity), since they better capture the variation in a heterogeneous landscape. The main objective of this study was to investigate if MODIS 500m reflectance data can be used to drive empirical models for regional estimations of GPP in Nordic forests. The performance of the proposed models was compared with the MODIS 1km GPP product. Linear regression analyses were made on 8-day averages of eddy covariance GPP from three deciduous and ten coniferous sites in relation to MODIS 8-day composite data and 8-day averages of modeled incoming PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density). Time series of EVI2 (two-band enhanced vegetation index) were calculated from MODIS 500m reflectance data and smoothed by a curve fitting procedure. For most sites, GPP was fairly strongly to strongly related to the product of EVI2 and PPFD (Deciduous: R<sup>2</sup>=0.45–0.86, Coniferous: R<sup>2</sup>=0.49–0.90). Similar strengths were found between GPP and the product of EVI2 and MODIS 1km daytime LST (land surface temperature) (R2=0.55–0.81, 0.57–0.77) and between GPP and EVI2, PPFD and daytime LST in multiple linear regressions (R<sup>2</sup>=0.73–0.89, 0.65–0.93). One year of data was collected from all coniferous sites to derive a general empirical model for GPP versus (1) the product of EVI2 and PPFD (R<sup>2</sup>=0.70), (2) the product of EVI2 and daytime LST (R<sup>2</sup>=0.62) and (3) EVI2, PPFD and daytime LST (R<sup>2</sup>=0.72). These three models were then validated at six sites for the remaining years by linearly relating eddy covariance GPP to modeled GPP, which resulted in fairly strong to strong relationships for most sites (R<sup>2</sup>=0.49–0.91, RMSE=0.63–1.22gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>, R<sup>2</sup>=0.53–0.73, RMSE=0.90–1.43gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>, R<sup>2</sup>=0.56–0.87, RMSE=0.79–1.11gCm<sup>−2</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>). In comparison, similar validation strengths were found for the latest collection 5.1 of the MODIS 1km GPP product (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59–0.88, RMSE=0.80–1.16gCm<sup>−2</sup>day<sup>−1</sup>). The main conclusion is that the suggested empirical models driven by MODIS 500m reflectance data can be used for regional estimations of Nordic forest GPP, while preserving a finer resolution than the MODIS 1km GPP product.</p>

KW - Gross primary productivity (GPP)

KW - Land surface temperature (LST)

KW - Light use efficiency (ε)

KW - Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)

KW - Two-band enhanced vegetation index (EVI2)

U2 - 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

DO - 10.1016/j.rse.2012.08.005

JO - Remote Sensing of Environment

JF - Remote Sensing of Environment

SN - 0034-4257

VL - 126

SP - 136

EP - 147

ER -