Improved ERM vaccination efficacy using combined vaccine administration methods

Publication: Research - peer-reviewConference abstract in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012

  • Author: Buchmann, Kurt, Denmark

    Laboratory of Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Author: Desmukh, Sidhartha, Denmark

    Laboratory of Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Author: Chettri, Jiwan Kumar, Denmark

    Laboratory of Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Author: Jafaar, Rzgar M., Denmark

    Laboratory of Aquatic Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Author: Dalsgaard, Inger

    Bacteriology & Pathology, Division of Veterinary Diagnostics and Research, National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Bülowsvej 27, DK-1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark

View graph of relations

We have previously shown that immersion vaccination (30 sec) using the Aquavac Relera vaccine (containing formalin killed Yersinia ruckeri serotype O1 of both biotypes 1 and 2) provides the best protection (when compared to other commercial ERM vaccines on the Danish market) against infection following i. p. challenge using Y. ruckeri O1, biotype 2, which at present is the main bacterial pathogen in fingerling trout production in Denmark. Despite a significant protection conferred by this vaccine (immersion) some mortality could be observed following challenge.
We have therefore performed a study in order to elucidate if different vaccine administration methods (using Aquavac Relera) can improve protection and reduce mortality of exposed trout following challenge with this particular pathogen. Rainbow trout (mean weight 7.8 g) reared at the Bornholm Salmon Hatchery under pathogen free conditions were vaccinated by 1) a single immersion (30 sec) and no booster, 2) a single immersion (30 sec) and a second immersion booster (30 sec) 410 degree-days later, 3) a single injection i.p. (0.1 ml) and no booster and finally 4) a single immersion (30 sec) and a booster injection i.p. (0.1 ml) 410 degree-days later. Fish were compared to naïve and non-vaccinated control fish. All experiments were performed in duplicate. Fish were brought to our university facilities, acclimated for 14 days and then challenged by i.p. injection of Y. ruckeri O1, biotype 2 (8.5 x 106 cfu/fish).
Control fish exhibited a mortality of 65 %, fish immersed only once showed a mortality of 36 %, fish immersed twice had 4 % mortality, fish injected once reached 2 % mortality. Rainbow trout immersed once and subsequently boosted by injection showed no mortality at all. This superior protection offered by a combination of primary immersion vaccination and a booster vaccination by injection may lead to improved health and reduced drug application in Danish trout farms.
Original languageEnglish
TitleDAFINET Workshop : Book of abstracts
Number of pages1
PublisherDanish Fish Immunology Research Centre and Network
Publication date2012
StatePublished

Conference

ConferenceDAFINET Workshop
CountryDenmark
CityCopenhagen
Period24/04/1225/04/12
Internet addresshttp://www.dafinet.dk
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 9679403