How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably
Publication: Research - peer-review › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012
Standard
How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably. / Korhonen, Jari; Burini, Nino; You, Junyong; Nadernejad, Ehsan.
In: 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2012. p. 57-62 .Publication: Research - peer-review › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably
A1 - Korhonen,Jari
A1 - Burini,Nino
A1 - You,Junyong
A1 - Nadernejad,Ehsan
AU - Korhonen,Jari
AU - Burini,Nino
AU - You,Junyong
AU - Nadernejad,Ehsan
PB - IEEE
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The typical procedure for evaluating the performance of different objective quality metrics and indices involves comparisons between subjective quality ratings and the quality indices obtained using the objective metrics in question on the known video sequences. Several correlation indicators can be employed to assess how well the subjective ratings can be predicted from the objective values. In this paper, we give an overview of the potential sources for uncertainties and inaccuracies in such studies, related both to the method of comparison, possible inaccuracies in the subjective data, as well as processing of subjective data. We also suggest some general guidelines for researchers to make comparison studies of objective video quality metrics more reliable and useful for the practitioners in the field.
AB - The typical procedure for evaluating the performance of different objective quality metrics and indices involves comparisons between subjective quality ratings and the quality indices obtained using the objective metrics in question on the known video sequences. Several correlation indicators can be employed to assess how well the subjective ratings can be predicted from the objective values. In this paper, we give an overview of the potential sources for uncertainties and inaccuracies in such studies, related both to the method of comparison, possible inaccuracies in the subjective data, as well as processing of subjective data. We also suggest some general guidelines for researchers to make comparison studies of objective video quality metrics more reliable and useful for the practitioners in the field.
KW - Video quality assessment
KW - Objective metrics
KW - Reliability
U2 - 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839
DO - 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839
SN - 978-1-4673-0724-6
BT - 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
T2 - 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
SP - 57
EP - 62
ER -