How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012

Standard

How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably. / Korhonen, Jari; Burini, Nino; You, Junyong; Nadernejad, Ehsan.

2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2012. p. 57-62 .

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012

Harvard

Korhonen, J, Burini, N, You, J & Nadernejad, E 2012, 'How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably'. in 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, pp. 57-62 ., 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

APA

Korhonen, J., Burini, N., You, J., & Nadernejad, E. (2012). How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably. In 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). (pp. 57-62 ). IEEE. 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

CBE

Korhonen J, Burini N, You J, Nadernejad E. 2012. How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably. In 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE. pp. 57-62 . Available from: 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

MLA

Korhonen, Jari et al. "How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably". 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE. 2012. 57-62 . Available: 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

Vancouver

Korhonen J, Burini N, You J, Nadernejad E. How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably. In 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE. 2012. p. 57-62 . Available from: 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

Author

Korhonen, Jari; Burini, Nino; You, Junyong; Nadernejad, Ehsan / How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably.

2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2012. p. 57-62 .

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012

Bibtex

@inbook{1a76eed93f5f4eb68c7531006175d30c,
title = "How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably",
keywords = "Video quality assessment, Objective metrics, Reliability",
publisher = "IEEE",
author = "Jari Korhonen and Nino Burini and Junyong You and Ehsan Nadernejad",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839",
isbn = "978-1-4673-0724-6",
pages = "57-62",
booktitle = "2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably

A1 - Korhonen,Jari

A1 - Burini,Nino

A1 - You,Junyong

A1 - Nadernejad,Ehsan

AU - Korhonen,Jari

AU - Burini,Nino

AU - You,Junyong

AU - Nadernejad,Ehsan

PB - IEEE

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The typical procedure for evaluating the performance of different objective quality metrics and indices involves comparisons between subjective quality ratings and the quality indices obtained using the objective metrics in question on the known video sequences. Several correlation indicators can be employed to assess how well the subjective ratings can be predicted from the objective values. In this paper, we give an overview of the potential sources for uncertainties and inaccuracies in such studies, related both to the method of comparison, possible inaccuracies in the subjective data, as well as processing of subjective data. We also suggest some general guidelines for researchers to make comparison studies of objective video quality metrics more reliable and useful for the practitioners in the field.

AB - The typical procedure for evaluating the performance of different objective quality metrics and indices involves comparisons between subjective quality ratings and the quality indices obtained using the objective metrics in question on the known video sequences. Several correlation indicators can be employed to assess how well the subjective ratings can be predicted from the objective values. In this paper, we give an overview of the potential sources for uncertainties and inaccuracies in such studies, related both to the method of comparison, possible inaccuracies in the subjective data, as well as processing of subjective data. We also suggest some general guidelines for researchers to make comparison studies of objective video quality metrics more reliable and useful for the practitioners in the field.

KW - Video quality assessment

KW - Objective metrics

KW - Reliability

U2 - 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

DO - 10.1109/QoMEX.2012.6263839

SN - 978-1-4673-0724-6

BT - 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)

T2 - 2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)

SP - 57

EP - 62

ER -