How to evaluate objective video quality metrics reliably

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2012

View graph of relations

The typical procedure for evaluating the performance of different objective quality metrics and indices involves comparisons between subjective quality ratings and the quality indices obtained using the objective metrics in question on the known video sequences. Several correlation indicators can be employed to assess how well the subjective ratings can be predicted from the objective values. In this paper, we give an overview of the potential sources for uncertainties and inaccuracies in such studies, related both to the method of comparison, possible inaccuracies in the subjective data, as well as processing of subjective data. We also suggest some general guidelines for researchers to make comparison studies of objective video quality metrics more reliable and useful for the practitioners in the field.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 Fourth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2012
Pages57-62
ISBN (print)978-1-4673-0724-6
ISBN (electronic)978-1-4673-0725-3
DOIs
StatePublished

Conference

Conference4th International Workshop onQuality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX)
CountryAustralia
CityMelbourne
Period05/07/1207/07/12
Internet addresshttp://www.qomex2012.org/
CitationsWeb of Science® Times Cited: No match on DOI

Keywords

  • Video quality assessment, Objective metrics, Reliability
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 10311116