Grey Box Modelling of Flow in Sewer Systems with State Dependent Diffusion
Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2011
Standard
Grey Box Modelling of Flow in Sewer Systems with State Dependent Diffusion. / Breinholt, Anders; Thordarson, Fannar Örn; Møller, Jan Kloppenborg; Grum, Morten; Mikkelsen, Peter Steen; Madsen, Henrik.
In: Environmetrics, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2011, p. 946-961.Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2011
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Grey Box Modelling of Flow in Sewer Systems with State Dependent Diffusion
A1 - Breinholt,Anders
A1 - Thordarson,Fannar Örn
A1 - Møller,Jan Kloppenborg
A1 - Grum,Morten
A1 - Mikkelsen,Peter Steen
A1 - Madsen,Henrik
AU - Breinholt,Anders
AU - Thordarson,Fannar Örn
AU - Møller,Jan Kloppenborg
AU - Grum,Morten
AU - Mikkelsen,Peter Steen
AU - Madsen,Henrik
PB - John/Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Generating flow forecasts with uncertainty limits from rain gauge inputs in sewer systems require simple models with identifiable parameters that can adequately describe the stochastic phenomena of the system. In this paper, a simple grey-box model is proposed that is attractive for both forecasting and control purposes. The grey-box model is based on stochastic differential equations and a key feature is the separation of the total noise into process and measurement noise. The grey-box approach is properly introduced and hypothesis regarding the noise terms are formulated. Three different hypotheses for the diffusion term are investigated and compared: one that assumes additive diffusion; one that assumes state proportional diffusion; and one that assumes state exponentiated diffusion. To implement the state dependent diffusion terms Itô's formula and the Lamperti transform are applied. It is shown that an additive diffusion noise term description leads to a violation of the physical constraints of the system, whereas a state dependent diffusion noise avoids this problem and should be favoured. It is also shown that a logarithmic transformation of the flow measurements secures positive lower flow prediction limits, because the observation noise is proportionally scaled with the modelled output. Finally it is concluded that a state proportional diffusion term best and adequately describes the one-step flow prediction uncertainty, and a proper description of the system noise is important for ascertaining the physical parameters in question.
AB - Generating flow forecasts with uncertainty limits from rain gauge inputs in sewer systems require simple models with identifiable parameters that can adequately describe the stochastic phenomena of the system. In this paper, a simple grey-box model is proposed that is attractive for both forecasting and control purposes. The grey-box model is based on stochastic differential equations and a key feature is the separation of the total noise into process and measurement noise. The grey-box approach is properly introduced and hypothesis regarding the noise terms are formulated. Three different hypotheses for the diffusion term are investigated and compared: one that assumes additive diffusion; one that assumes state proportional diffusion; and one that assumes state exponentiated diffusion. To implement the state dependent diffusion terms Itô's formula and the Lamperti transform are applied. It is shown that an additive diffusion noise term description leads to a violation of the physical constraints of the system, whereas a state dependent diffusion noise avoids this problem and should be favoured. It is also shown that a logarithmic transformation of the flow measurements secures positive lower flow prediction limits, because the observation noise is proportionally scaled with the modelled output. Finally it is concluded that a state proportional diffusion term best and adequately describes the one-step flow prediction uncertainty, and a proper description of the system noise is important for ascertaining the physical parameters in question.
U2 - 10.1002/env.1135
DO - 10.1002/env.1135
JO - Environmetrics
JF - Environmetrics
SN - 1180-4009
IS - 8
VL - 22
SP - 946
EP - 961
ER -