Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks
Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2011
Standard
Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks. / Grieger, Khara Deanne; Linkov, Igor; Hansen, Steffen Foss; Baun, Anders.
In: Nanotoxicology, Vol. 6, 2012, p. 196-212.Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2011
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks
A1 - Grieger,Khara Deanne
A1 - Linkov,Igor
A1 - Hansen,Steffen Foss
A1 - Baun,Anders
AU - Grieger,Khara Deanne
AU - Linkov,Igor
AU - Hansen,Steffen Foss
AU - Baun,Anders
PB - Informa Healthcare
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In response to the challenges of conducting traditional human health and ecological risk assessment for nanomaterials (NM), a number of alternative frameworks have been proposed for NM risk analysis. This paper evaluates various risk analysis frameworks proposed for NM based on a number of criteria. Among other results, most frameworks were found to be flexible for multiple NM, suitable for multiple decision contexts, included life cycle perspectives and precautionary aspects, transparent and able to include qualitative and quantitative data. Nevertheless, most frameworks were primarily applicable to occupational settings with minor environmental considerations, and most have not been thoroughly tested on a wide range of NM. Care should also be taken when selecting the most appropriate risk analysis strategy for a given risk context. Given this, we recommend a multi-faceted approach to assess the environmental risks of NM as well as increased applications and testing of the proposed frameworks for different NM.
AB - In response to the challenges of conducting traditional human health and ecological risk assessment for nanomaterials (NM), a number of alternative frameworks have been proposed for NM risk analysis. This paper evaluates various risk analysis frameworks proposed for NM based on a number of criteria. Among other results, most frameworks were found to be flexible for multiple NM, suitable for multiple decision contexts, included life cycle perspectives and precautionary aspects, transparent and able to include qualitative and quantitative data. Nevertheless, most frameworks were primarily applicable to occupational settings with minor environmental considerations, and most have not been thoroughly tested on a wide range of NM. Care should also be taken when selecting the most appropriate risk analysis strategy for a given risk context. Given this, we recommend a multi-faceted approach to assess the environmental risks of NM as well as increased applications and testing of the proposed frameworks for different NM.
KW - Nanomaterials
KW - Risk analysis
KW - Environmental risk assessment
U2 - 10.3109/17435390.2011.569095
DO - 10.3109/17435390.2011.569095
JO - Nanotoxicology
JF - Nanotoxicology
SN - 1743-5390
VL - 6
SP - 196
EP - 212
ER -