Efficiency of Compressed Air Energy Storage
Publication: Research - peer-review › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2011
Standard
Efficiency of Compressed Air Energy Storage. / Elmegaard, Brian; Brix, Wiebke.
In: The 24th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems: The 2011 conference motto: International Smart Energy Networks of Cooperation for Sustainable Development. 2011.Publication: Research - peer-review › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2011
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Efficiency of Compressed Air Energy Storage
A1 - Elmegaard,Brian
A1 - Brix,Wiebke
AU - Elmegaard,Brian
AU - Brix,Wiebke
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The simplest type of a Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) facility would be an adiabatic process consisting only of a compressor, a storage and a turbine, compressing air into a container when storing and expanding when producing. This type of CAES would be adiabatic and would if the machines were reversible have a storage efficiency of 100%. However, due to the specific capacity of the storage and the construction materials the air is cooled during and after compression in practice, making the CAES process diabatic. The cooling involves exergy losses and thus lowers the efficiency of the storage significantly. The efficiency of CAES as an electricity storage may be defined in several ways, we discuss these and find that the exergetic efficiency of compression, storage and production together determine the efficiency of CAES. In the paper we find that the efficiency of the practical CAES electricity storage is 25-45% and thus has a quite low efficiency, which is close to the efficiency of the simple diabatic CAES-process. Adiabatic CAES would reach significantly higher storage efficiency about 70-80%.
AB - The simplest type of a Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) facility would be an adiabatic process consisting only of a compressor, a storage and a turbine, compressing air into a container when storing and expanding when producing. This type of CAES would be adiabatic and would if the machines were reversible have a storage efficiency of 100%. However, due to the specific capacity of the storage and the construction materials the air is cooled during and after compression in practice, making the CAES process diabatic. The cooling involves exergy losses and thus lowers the efficiency of the storage significantly. The efficiency of CAES as an electricity storage may be defined in several ways, we discuss these and find that the exergetic efficiency of compression, storage and production together determine the efficiency of CAES. In the paper we find that the efficiency of the practical CAES electricity storage is 25-45% and thus has a quite low efficiency, which is close to the efficiency of the simple diabatic CAES-process. Adiabatic CAES would reach significantly higher storage efficiency about 70-80%.
KW - Exergy analysis
KW - Electricity storage
KW - Compressed Air Energy Storage
BT - The 24th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
T2 - The 24th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems
ER -