Does functional redundancy stabilize fish communities?

Publication: ResearchPaper – Annual report year: 2012

Standard

Does functional redundancy stabilize fish communities?. / Rice, Jake; Daan, Niels; Gislason, Henrik; Pope, John.

2012.

Publication: ResearchPaper – Annual report year: 2012

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Rice, Jake; Daan, Niels; Gislason, Henrik; Pope, John / Does functional redundancy stabilize fish communities?.

2012.

Publication: ResearchPaper – Annual report year: 2012

Bibtex

@misc{40e7c44cf3814f41a4214f8798783db3,
title = "Does functional redundancy stabilize fish communities?",
author = "Jake Rice and Niels Daan and Henrik Gislason and John Pope",
year = "2012",

}

RIS

TY - CONF

T1 - Does functional redundancy stabilize fish communities?

AU - Rice,Jake

AU - Daan,Niels

AU - Gislason,Henrik

AU - Pope,John

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Functional redundancy is a community property thought to contribute to ecosystem resilience. It is argued that trophic (or other) functional groups with more species have more linkages and opportunities to buffer variation in abundance of individual species. We explored this concept with a 30‐year time‐series of data on 83 species sampled in the International Bottom Trawl Survey. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that functional redundancy leads to more stable (and by inference more resilient) communities. Over the time‐series trophic groups (assigned by diet, size (Lmax) group, or both factors) with more species had lower coefficients of variation (CVs) in abundance and biomass than did trophic groups with fewer species. These findings are also consistent with Bernoulli’s Law of Large Numbers, a rule that does not require complex ecological and evolutionary processes to produce the observed patterns. Through iterative randomizations of the species’ time‐series into groupings of the same size as the functional groups, we developed expected pdfs of CVs in abundances and biomasses, assuming only the Law of Large Numbers was <br/>at work. The observed CVs of all groupings were not significantly different from these simulated distributions. These results do not prove the absence of ecological processes contributing to the greater stability of functional groups with more redundancy, however they do not justify invoking any such processes. The results support management approaches that maintain species richness, but do not require management to try to protect complex (and poorly understood) ecological processes

AB - Functional redundancy is a community property thought to contribute to ecosystem resilience. It is argued that trophic (or other) functional groups with more species have more linkages and opportunities to buffer variation in abundance of individual species. We explored this concept with a 30‐year time‐series of data on 83 species sampled in the International Bottom Trawl Survey. Our results were consistent with the hypothesis that functional redundancy leads to more stable (and by inference more resilient) communities. Over the time‐series trophic groups (assigned by diet, size (Lmax) group, or both factors) with more species had lower coefficients of variation (CVs) in abundance and biomass than did trophic groups with fewer species. These findings are also consistent with Bernoulli’s Law of Large Numbers, a rule that does not require complex ecological and evolutionary processes to produce the observed patterns. Through iterative randomizations of the species’ time‐series into groupings of the same size as the functional groups, we developed expected pdfs of CVs in abundances and biomasses, assuming only the Law of Large Numbers was <br/>at work. The observed CVs of all groupings were not significantly different from these simulated distributions. These results do not prove the absence of ecological processes contributing to the greater stability of functional groups with more redundancy, however they do not justify invoking any such processes. The results support management approaches that maintain species richness, but do not require management to try to protect complex (and poorly understood) ecological processes

M3 - Paper

ER -