Culture in Engineering Education : CDIO framing intercultural competences
Publication: Research › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2011
Standard
Culture in Engineering Education : CDIO framing intercultural competences. / Hoffmann, Birgitte; Jørgensen, Ulrik; Christensen, Hans Peter.
In: 7th International CDIO Conference 20th-22nd June. Kgs. Lyngby : Technical University of Denmark, 2011. p. 651-663.Publication: Research › Article in proceedings – Annual report year: 2011
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - GEN
T1 - Culture in Engineering Education
T2 - 7th International CDIO Conference 20th-22nd June
A1 - Hoffmann,Birgitte
A1 - Jørgensen,Ulrik
A1 - Christensen,Hans Peter
AU - Hoffmann,Birgitte
AU - Jørgensen,Ulrik
AU - Christensen,Hans Peter
PB - Technical University of Denmark
CY - Kgs. Lyngby
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - As engineers today often work in intercultural projects and contexts, intercultural competences must be part of the learning objectives in engineering educations. Cultural aspects of engineering education should not just be treated as a question of appropriate communication and teaching: cultural aspects are basically part of engineering discipli¬nes, work challenges as well as the contextual elements in engineering curriculum [1,2]. This is reflected in the aims of the CDIO programme [3,4]; however, the programme, as well as the teaching practises, undoubtedly needs to further develop approaches to cultural aspects in engineering education. Hence the key-question of this paper is how CDIO support the development of intercultural competences in engineering education. The paper explores the implementation of CDIO in an intercultural arctic engineering programme in Greenland that since 2001 has been enrolling students with special focus on developing intercultural competences. The discussion draws on the socio-technical approaches to technology and professional engineering practises [5,6]. We conclude that intercultural teaching is not just a matter of teaching in spite of cultural differences; it involves the ability to communicate across differences and foster mutual learning processes and approaches to problem solving. We also point to methods and lessons learned to address this challenge in practice. The discussions and findings of the paper have relevance in several ways. Firstly, it addresses the continuously development of CDIO, including the current discussion of a new principles [7]. Secondly it has practical relevance to the engineering education, which to a growing degree has to cope with the potentials and challenges of internationalisation of educations and thus intercultural classrooms. Thirdly it has a more general relevance for educational development as engineers most often are working in projects within different cultural settings and contexts and in culturally diverse groups.
AB - As engineers today often work in intercultural projects and contexts, intercultural competences must be part of the learning objectives in engineering educations. Cultural aspects of engineering education should not just be treated as a question of appropriate communication and teaching: cultural aspects are basically part of engineering discipli¬nes, work challenges as well as the contextual elements in engineering curriculum [1,2]. This is reflected in the aims of the CDIO programme [3,4]; however, the programme, as well as the teaching practises, undoubtedly needs to further develop approaches to cultural aspects in engineering education. Hence the key-question of this paper is how CDIO support the development of intercultural competences in engineering education. The paper explores the implementation of CDIO in an intercultural arctic engineering programme in Greenland that since 2001 has been enrolling students with special focus on developing intercultural competences. The discussion draws on the socio-technical approaches to technology and professional engineering practises [5,6]. We conclude that intercultural teaching is not just a matter of teaching in spite of cultural differences; it involves the ability to communicate across differences and foster mutual learning processes and approaches to problem solving. We also point to methods and lessons learned to address this challenge in practice. The discussions and findings of the paper have relevance in several ways. Firstly, it addresses the continuously development of CDIO, including the current discussion of a new principles [7]. Secondly it has practical relevance to the engineering education, which to a growing degree has to cope with the potentials and challenges of internationalisation of educations and thus intercultural classrooms. Thirdly it has a more general relevance for educational development as engineers most often are working in projects within different cultural settings and contexts and in culturally diverse groups.
KW - Community networking
KW - Engineering context
KW - Programme development
KW - Intercultural competences
KW - Authenticity
UR - http://www.cdio2011.dtu.dk/About/Proceedings.aspx
SN - 978-87-985272-6-8
BT - 7th International CDIO Conference 20th-22nd June
SP - 651
EP - 663
ER -