Can We Trust Real Time Measurements of Lung Deposited Surface Area Concentrations in Dust from Powder Nanomaterials?

Publication: Research - peer-reviewJournal article – Annual report year: 2016

DOI

  • Author: Levin, Marcus

    Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

  • Author: Witschger, Olivier

    Institut National de Recherche et de Securité, France

  • Author: Bau, Sebastien

    Institut National de Recherche et de Securité, France

  • Author: Jankowska, Elzbieta

  • Author: Koponen, Ismo K.

    National Research Center for Working Environment, Denmark

  • Author: Koivisto, Antti J.

    National Research Center for Working Environment, Denmark

  • Author: Clausen, Per A.

    National Research Center for Working Environment, Denmark

  • Author: Jensen, Alexander

    National Research Center for Working Environment, Denmark

  • Author: Mølhave, Kristian

    Molecular Windows, Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

  • Author: Asbach, Christof

    Institut für Energie- und Umwelttec hnik (IUTA), Germany

  • Author: Jensen, Keld A.

    National Research Center for Working Environment, Denmark

View graph of relations

A comparison between various methods for real-time measurements of lung deposited surface area (LDSA) using spherical particles and powder dust with specific surface area ranging from 0.03 to 112 m2 g-1 was conducted. LDSA concentrations measured directly using Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM) and Aerotrak and were compared to LDSA concentrations recalculated from size distribution measurements using Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) and Fast Mobility Particle Sizer (FMPS). FMPS and ELPI measurements were also compared to dust surface area concentrations estimated from gravimetrical filter measurements and specific surface areas. Measurement of LDSA showed very good correlation in measurements of spherical particles (R2 > 0.97, Ratio 1.0 to 1.04). High surface area nanomaterial powders showed a fairly reliable correlation between NSAM and Aerotrak (R2 0.73-0.93) and a material-dependent offset in the ratios (1.04-2.8). However, the correlation and ratio were inconsistent for lower LDSA concentrations. Similar levels of correlation were observed for the NSAM and the FMPS for high surface area materials, but with the FMPS overestimating the LDSA concentration. The ELPI showed good correlation with NSAM data for high LDSA materials (R2 0.87-0.93), but not for lower LDSA concentrations (R2 0.50-0.72). Comparisons of respirable dust surface area from ELPI data correlated well (R2 > 0.98) with that calculated from filter samples, but materials-specific exceptions were present. We conclude that there is currently insufficient reliability and comparability between methods in the measurement of LDSA concentrations. Further development is required to enable use of LDSA for reliable dose metric and regulatory enforcement of exposure.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAerosol and Air Quality Research
Volume16
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1105-1117
Number of pages13
ISSN1680-8584
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
CitationsWeb of Science® Times Cited: 5

    Keywords

  • Lung deposited surface area, Exposure assessment, Aerosol measurement, Dustiness
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 126903812