BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2010

Standard

BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES. / Andersson, Niclas; Büchmann-Slorup, Rolf.

Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Cairo, Egypt : Virginia Tech, 2010. p. 113.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2010

Harvard

Andersson, N & Büchmann-Slorup, R 2010, 'BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES'. in Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Virginia Tech, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 113.

APA

Andersson, N., & Büchmann-Slorup, R. (2010). BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES. In Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. (pp. 113). Cairo, Egypt: Virginia Tech.

CBE

Andersson N, Büchmann-Slorup R. 2010. BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES. In Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Cairo, Egypt: Virginia Tech. pp. 113.

MLA

Andersson, Niclas and Rolf Büchmann-Slorup "BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES". Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Cairo, Egypt: Virginia Tech. 2010. 113.

Vancouver

Andersson N, Büchmann-Slorup R. BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES. In Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Cairo, Egypt: Virginia Tech. 2010. p. 113.

Author

Andersson, Niclas; Büchmann-Slorup, Rolf / BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION : A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES.

Applications of IT in the AEC Industry: Proceeding of the 27th International Conference - CIB W78 2010. Cairo, Egypt : Virginia Tech, 2010. p. 113.

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2010

Bibtex

@inbook{80dc0b8966384649bafa513bdd256991,
title = "BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PREVAILING AND BIM-BASED SCHEDULING PROCESSES",
keywords = "planning and scheduling, gap analysis, 4D-modeling, implementation, BIM,",
publisher = "Virginia Tech",
author = "Niclas Andersson and Rolf Büchmann-Slorup",
year = "2010",
pages = "113",
booktitle = "Applications of IT in the AEC Industry",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - BIM-BASED SCHEDULING OF CONSTRUCTION

T2 - Applications of IT in the AEC Industry

A1 - Andersson,Niclas

A1 - Büchmann-Slorup,Rolf

AU - Andersson,Niclas

AU - Büchmann-Slorup,Rolf

PB - Virginia Tech

CY - Cairo, Egypt

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The potential of BIM is generally recognized in the construction industry, but the practical application of BIM for management purposes is, however, still limited among contractors. The objective of this study is to review the current scheduling process of construction in light of BIM-based scheduling, and to identify how it should be incorporated into current practice. The analysis of the current scheduling processes identifies significant discrepancies between the overall and the detailed levels of scheduling. The overall scheduling process is described as an individual endeavor with limited and unsystematic sharing of knowledge within and between projects. Thus, the reuse of scheduling data and experiences are inadequate, preventing continuous improvements of the overall schedules. Besides, the overall scheduling process suffers from lack of information, caused by uncoordinated and unsynchronized overlap of the design and construction processes. Consequently, the overall scheduling is primarily based on intuition and personal experiences, rather than well founded figures of the specific project. Finally, the overall schedule is comprehensive and complex, and consequently, difficult to overview and communicate. Scheduling on the detailed level, on the other hand, follows a stipulated approach to scheduling, i.e. the Last Planner System (LPS), which is characterized by involvement of all actors in the construction phase. Thus, the major challenge when implementing BIM-based scheduling is to improve overall scheduling, which in turn, can secure a better starting point of the LPS. The study points to the necessity of involving subcontractors and manufactures in the earliest phases of the project in order to create project specific information for the overall schedule. In addition, the design process should be prioritized and coordinated with each craft, a process library should be introduced to promote transfer of knowledge and continuous improvements, and information flow between design and scheduling processes must change from push to pull.

AB - The potential of BIM is generally recognized in the construction industry, but the practical application of BIM for management purposes is, however, still limited among contractors. The objective of this study is to review the current scheduling process of construction in light of BIM-based scheduling, and to identify how it should be incorporated into current practice. The analysis of the current scheduling processes identifies significant discrepancies between the overall and the detailed levels of scheduling. The overall scheduling process is described as an individual endeavor with limited and unsystematic sharing of knowledge within and between projects. Thus, the reuse of scheduling data and experiences are inadequate, preventing continuous improvements of the overall schedules. Besides, the overall scheduling process suffers from lack of information, caused by uncoordinated and unsynchronized overlap of the design and construction processes. Consequently, the overall scheduling is primarily based on intuition and personal experiences, rather than well founded figures of the specific project. Finally, the overall schedule is comprehensive and complex, and consequently, difficult to overview and communicate. Scheduling on the detailed level, on the other hand, follows a stipulated approach to scheduling, i.e. the Last Planner System (LPS), which is characterized by involvement of all actors in the construction phase. Thus, the major challenge when implementing BIM-based scheduling is to improve overall scheduling, which in turn, can secure a better starting point of the LPS. The study points to the necessity of involving subcontractors and manufactures in the earliest phases of the project in order to create project specific information for the overall schedule. In addition, the design process should be prioritized and coordinated with each craft, a process library should be introduced to promote transfer of knowledge and continuous improvements, and information flow between design and scheduling processes must change from push to pull.

KW - planning and scheduling

KW - gap analysis

KW - 4D-modeling

KW - implementation

KW - BIM

BT - Applications of IT in the AEC Industry

SP - 113

ER -