Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities

Publication: Research - peer-reviewArticle in proceedings – Annual report year: 2017

DOI

View graph of relations

We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2017
Pages89-90
ISBN (electronic)978-1-5090-5323-0
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017
Event17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17) - Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

Conference

Conference17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17)
CountryDenmark
CityKgs. Lyngby
Period24/07/201728/07/2017
CitationsWeb of Science® Times Cited: No match on DOI

    Keywords

  • Photonic crystal, Microcavity, Line defect cavity, Quality factor, Numerical simulations
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBE/CSEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 136748099