Assessing emergency situations and their aftermath in urban areas: The EMRAS II Urban Areas Working Group

Publication: Research - peer-reviewConference article – Annual report year: 2012

  • Author: Thiessen, K.M.

    SENES Oak Ridge, Inc. (US)

  • Author: Andersson, Kasper Grann

    Center for Nuclear Technologies, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

  • Author: Berkovskyy, V.

    International Atomic Energy Agency (AT)

  • Author: Charnock, T.W.

    Health Protection Agency (GB)

  • Author: Chouhan, S.L.

    Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (CA)

  • Author: de With, G.

    Nuclear Research & Consultancy Group (NL)

  • Author: Ďúran, J.

    VÚJE Inc., Slovakia

  • Author: Fuka, V.

    Charles University (CZ)

  • Author: Helebrant, J.

    National Radiation Protection Institute (CZ)

  • Author: Hůlka, J.

    National Radiation Protection Institute (CZ)

  • Author: Hwang, W.T.

    Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute

  • Author: Kuča, P.

    National Radiation Protection Institute (CZ)

  • Author: Mancini, F.

    SOGIN S.p.A. (IT)

  • Author: Navarro, E.

    Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)

  • Author: Periáñez, R.

    ETSIA, Universidad de Sevilla (ES)

  • Author: Prouza, Z.

    National Radiation Protection Institute (CZ)

  • Author: Sdouz, G.

    Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT)

  • Author: Tomás, J.

    Centro de Protección e Higiene de las Radiaciones, Cuba

  • Author: Trifunović, D.

    State Office for Radiological and Nuclear Safety, Croatia

  • Author: Urso, L.

    Helmholtz-Zentrum München GmbH (DE)

  • Author: Walter, H.

    Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (DE)

View graph of relations

The Urban Areas Working Group is part of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s EMRAS II (Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety) Programme. The goal of this Working Group is to test and improve the capabilities of models used in assessment of radioactive contamination in urban settings, including dispersion and deposition events, short- and long-term contaminant redistribution following deposition events, and potential countermeasures or remediation efforts for reducing human exposures and doses. The Working Group has developed three modeling exercises, which are designed to permit intercomparison of model predictions and, in one case, comparison of model predictions with measurements. This paper describes the scenarios and provides comparisons of initial modeling results. Reasons for similarities and discrepancies among model predictions are discussed in terms of the modeling approaches, models, and parameter values used by different assessors. Preliminary conclusions emphasize the value of explaining individual approaches and the importance of understanding the effects of different assumptions and parameter values on the modeling results.
Original languageEnglish
JournalRadioprotection
Publication date9 Jan 2011
Volume46
Journal number6
PagesS601-S607
ISSN0033-8451
DOIs
StatePublished

Conference

ConferenceInternational Conference on Radioecology & Environmental Radioactivity
CountryCanada
CityHamilton
Period19/06/1124/06/11
CitationsWeb of Science® Times Cited: No match on DOI
Download as:
Download as PDF
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
PDF
Download as HTML
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
HTML
Download as Word
Select render style:
APAAuthorCBEHarvardMLAStandardVancouverShortLong
Word

ID: 6600026