A non-contact 3D method to characterize the surface roughness of castings
Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2013
Standard
A non-contact 3D method to characterize the surface roughness of castings. / Nwaogu, Ugochukwu Chibuzoh; Tiedje, Niels Skat ; Hansen, Hans Nørgaard.
In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 213, No. 1, 2013, p. 59-68.Publication: Research - peer-review › Journal article – Annual report year: 2013
Harvard
APA
CBE
MLA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A non-contact 3D method to characterize the surface roughness of castings
A1 - Nwaogu,Ugochukwu Chibuzoh
A1 - Tiedje,Niels Skat
A1 - Hansen,Hans Nørgaard
AU - Nwaogu,Ugochukwu Chibuzoh
AU - Tiedje,Niels Skat
AU - Hansen,Hans Nørgaard
PB - Elsevier S.A.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - A non-contact technique using a 3D optical system was used to measure the surface roughness of two selected standard surface roughness comparators used in the foundry industry. Profile and areal analyses were performed using scanning probe image processor (SPIP) software. The results show that the surface quality of the standard comparators was successfully evaluated and it was established that the areal parameters are the most informative for cast components. The results from the surface comparators were compared with the results from a stylus instrument. Sand cast components were also evaluated and the surface roughness parameter (Sa) values were compared with those of the standards. Sa parameter suffices for the evaluation of casting surface texture. The S series comparators showed a better description of the surface of castings after shot blasting than the A series.
AB - A non-contact technique using a 3D optical system was used to measure the surface roughness of two selected standard surface roughness comparators used in the foundry industry. Profile and areal analyses were performed using scanning probe image processor (SPIP) software. The results show that the surface quality of the standard comparators was successfully evaluated and it was established that the areal parameters are the most informative for cast components. The results from the surface comparators were compared with the results from a stylus instrument. Sand cast components were also evaluated and the surface roughness parameter (Sa) values were compared with those of the standards. Sa parameter suffices for the evaluation of casting surface texture. The S series comparators showed a better description of the surface of castings after shot blasting than the A series.
KW - Sand castings
KW - Surface roughness characterization
KW - Optical technique
KW - Scanning probe image processor
KW - Stylus instrument
KW - Surface roughness comparators
U2 - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.08.008
JO - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
JF - Journal of Materials Processing Technology
SN - 0924-0136
IS - 1
VL - 213
SP - 59
EP - 68
ER -